<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.jeffsbench.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>General Science</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mentoring</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/257</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article is from June, but I had missed it. It&#039;s a very in depth article about what makes a good mentor. It&#039;s a bit of a long read, but it has lots of good information to think about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/257#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/13">Journal Article</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:08:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">257 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>p53 mutations</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/255</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a new review about the functions of p53 mutations that also discusses the role of genetic background and cell type on the outcome of certain mutations. This review really exposes the complexity of p53 biology. I wonder if this much complexity is unique to p53 or just known about p53 because there have been so many studies?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/255#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/13">Journal Article</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/37">Life Science</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:03:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">255 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Health 2.0</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/252</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Economist has an article about &quot;Health 2.0&quot;. They discuss online forums for discussion of health issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/252#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:50:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">252 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Neurocognitive correlates of &quot;flip-flopping&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/251</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not to be too political, but now we have the ability to screen young &quot;potential-conservatives&quot; and intervene before it is too late.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/251#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/13">Journal Article</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:04:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hal.berman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">251 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Remove Pecha Kucha and turn your presentations in poetry (and then sit the heck down)</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/250</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Talk about a cure for head-nodding and auditorium slobber.  How many people do you know that need to add a little Pecha Kucha to their presentations?  I challenge all of you out there, next time you are up for a 45-min presentation, pull the &quot;PK&quot; card and then spend the remaining 38:20 minutes trying to actually have a little meaningful discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/250#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:14:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hal.berman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">250 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Think outside the box (and yourself)</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/247</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have to love the occasional Science article that comes out of no where and involves relatively simple off the shelf equipment.  This one is mind blowing for its implications.  For most of us, and for the most part, our sensory perceptions are fairly accurate.  And we experience few optical illusions during routine living.  But this is now about to change.  The day will soon arrive when all of us will be wearing computerized info-goggles.  When this day comes, imagine the implications of a &quot;sensory virus.&quot;  In the short term, this technology may have a lot of commercial implications such as sensory rewiring for those in chronic pain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/247&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/247#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/13">Journal Article</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:11:46 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hal.berman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">247 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Zotero - Replacement for EndNote?</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/246</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zotero is a new extension for Firefox that looks like a great new challenger to EndNote. It is a free, open-source, platform-independent reference mananger that looks like it has a lot of great features. I haven&#039;t played around with it much yet, but when I do I will post a review in the blog section. I&#039;d be interested to hear an opinion from anyone who has tried it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/246#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:57:02 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">246 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Neolithic Gingivitis</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/245</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Student finds 5000 year old chewing gum that may have been just the thing for those rotting, festering, purulent gums that come with never brushing your teeth.  A little phenol probably did the trick and quite possibly came with bonus buzz.  Nice field work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/245#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:11:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hal.berman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">245 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pilferage. In the Pipeline:</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/243</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny blog post about people &quot;borrowing&quot; reagents in the lab during grad school. My favorite experience with this was discovering that the &quot;lab stock&quot; of protease inhibitors was actually a post doc&#039;s private stock. This was discovered after I asked her if I could borrow some since the lab stock was gone. She promptly went to the same box I had been looking in (and taking from) and found that it was gone. My famous last words were, &quot;Oops, I thought that was the lab stock.......&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/243#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:34:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">243 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sex and intelligence</title>
 <link>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/241</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;&lt;p&gt;This link references quite a few studies about intelligence and sex. In short, smart and dumb people have less sex. The article discusses the possible reasons, both obvious and not so obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On another note, the NY Times has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/31/science/31tier.html?em&amp;amp;ex=1186113600&amp;amp;en=193f3472d7a6827b&amp;amp;ei=5087%0A&quot;&gt;article &lt;/a&gt; about 237 reasons to have sex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.jeffsbench.com/node/241#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/15">General Science</category>
 <category domain="http://www.jeffsbench.com/taxonomy/term/12">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:30:52 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">241 at http://www.jeffsbench.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
